tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506451.post8750406851449411185..comments2023-10-31T06:44:26.393-07:00Comments on Billings Blog: Fair is fairDavidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00372790238744903272noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506451.post-34163923379384056952007-07-07T13:46:00.000-07:002007-07-07T13:46:00.000-07:00Two points: 1. I would suggest that growth in rad...Two points: <BR/>1. I would suggest that growth in radio stations may be related to the expansion into FM; and<BR/>2. that it may be related to the growth of small, very limited (read that five miles or less) radio stations around the country.<BR/>The bigger question that needs answering is the impact of limited ownership on the air waves, both tv and radio.Chuck Rightmirehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06985358507956039363noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506451.post-36143801641607949392007-07-06T15:07:00.000-07:002007-07-06T15:07:00.000-07:00It's supply & demand.If there was a following for ...It's supply & demand.<BR/><BR/>If there was a following for liberal talk radio, the stations would carry it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506451.post-51739277331091489642007-07-06T13:35:00.000-07:002007-07-06T13:35:00.000-07:00"Though the notion appears quaint today, the doctr..."Though the notion appears quaint today, the doctrine arose out of the principle that because the broadcast spectrum is limited, its use should be regulated by the government."<BR/><BR/>Yeah, quaint, all right. First, we call it the Pre-Digital World, wherein radio stations needed a frequency allocation about the width of a Mack truck to avoid running over the next station’s assigned frequency, Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com