Saturday, August 14, 2004

Kerry redux

The other thing I wanted to say about Kerry and the Swift Boat vets was that, with each passing day, it gets harder to justify media silence on this. Even the Kerry campaign has deigned to acknowledge problems in Kerry's account of his alleged journey into Cambodia. But enter "Kerry Cambodia" into Google News and almost nothing turns up outside right-leaning websites, the Washington Times, the Telegraph and the New York Post.

A bit of caution is in order before trashing a candidate's biography. The blogosphere operates in an entirely different mode than the mainstream media: Among bloggers, the value of a story is determined by its volume. The more comments, the more links, the more buzz, the bigger the story. Reporters are restrained by their inability to opine endlessly. They have to find a way to move the story forward before they can write a daily story. And they are held accountable for what they write in ways that rarely exist in the bloggers' world.

But this story, whatever the facts, is taking on a political life of its own. Somebody, somewhere in the national press, had better be doing some hard digging.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

The media talk badly about John Kerry? It'll never happen! They are driven by their pure hatred for Bush, and if it wasn't for their propping up this weak candidate he'd not even be competitive in the polls right now.

I heard the swift boat vets on a talk show a couple of weeks ago, and their story is very telling, especially the Doctor who treated Kerry, and turned him down for his purple heart.

It amazes me the twists & turns Kerry has gotten away with!

Chuck Rightmire said...

i read Bill O'Reilly about once in a blue moon. My astronomer hobby friends told me last week that July was a blue moon month so I read Bill O'Reilly in the Monday morning Gazoo. Guess what? He thinks the Swift Boat anti-kerry bunch ought to sign off. Isn't that exciting?